Even some left-wing publications are saying that the Manhattan DA's criminal charges against Donald Trump are anything but consensual.

Donald Trump

Former President Donald Trump sits at the defense table with his defense team in a Manhattan courtroom Tuesday, April 4, 2023.AP Photo/Seth Wenig, Poole

  • Many legal experts say the charges against Donald Trump are far from defamation.

  • Even some left-wing publications seem to agree that the case will be difficult for prosecutors.

  • Trump has been indicted by a Manhattan grand jury on 34 counts of falsifying business records.

When New York’s “hush-money” lawsuit against Donald Trump Finally revealed on Tuesday, many Legal experts agree that it is not an airy, brutal case. From Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

And even among left-wing publications like New York Magazine Intelligence, The New Republic and Vox, there seems to be a consensus that a case against the former president will be difficult for prosecutors.

Trump has been indicted by a Manhattan grand jury on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in connection with hush money payments to two women, including porn star Stormy Daniels, before the 2016 presidential election.

In a statement of charges filed alongside the indictment, from August 2015 to December 2017, Trump “in “By identifying and buying into a scheme with others to influence the 2016 presidential election by purchasing negative information about him to suppress publications and interests,” prosecutors said in the indictment. Electoral Prospects.”

But Trump is not being charged with election violations or conspiracy, and legal experts say the basic crime Trump is accused of committing — upgrading the charges against him from a misdemeanor to a felony — is strikingly missing from the indictment.

The Manhattan DA’s office declined to comment for this story, instead referring to Bragg’s comments to reporters Tuesday after the arraignment: “These are serious crimes in New York State, no matter who you are.” We cannot and will not do heavy normalization. A criminal act.”

Columnist Jonathan Chait He wrote on the intelligentsia He said that Bragg’s charges stemmed from a political position and that “these charges carry more social and political weight than they can carry.”

“While the public may be thought to have an important right to know about Trump’s affairs, campaign-finance laws are not designed or intended to protect that right,” Chat wrote.

as if Vox textSenior correspondent Ian Milhiser noted that there was “something terribly anticlimactic” about the impeachment against Trump.

“And there is a very real risk that this case could end up being overturned,” Milhiser wrote. “It is not clear whether the criminal law that Trump has been accused of violating applies to him.”

Bragg, the Democratic district attorney, “built his case on an extremely uncertain legal theory,” and even if Trump did what Bragg accused, “it’s not clear that Bragg can legally charge Trump with the Trump lawsuit,” Milhiser wrote.

of New Republic published a piece Under the headline – “Why Alvin Bragg’s Hash Money Case Will Be Tricky to Win Against Trump” – he pointed out that it is a more serious crime to falsify business records in the first degree.

However, not all outlets were so pessimistic about it.

Eli Mistal, the justice journalist of the country He said in the article. Falsifying business records “is where prosecutors find you when there’s nothing else.”

But he added, “Bragg’s specific case — that Trump falsified trade records — is strong, and apparently, supported by a lot of documentary evidence.”

A New York Times opinion piece By Karen Friedman Agnifilo, a former Manhattan chief assistant district attorney, and Norman Eisen, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, took a very different tone.

“We finally know the impeachment against Trump and it’s strong,” read the caption.

The article continued, “With the release of the indictment and the disclosure of information, we can now say that there is nothing new or weak in this case.”

MSNBC’s Joyce Vance called the allegation “a tough piece of prosecutorial business” that used multiple crimes, including election and tax violations, to justify a criminal charge open to prosecutors.

Meanwhile, Daily Beast Shan Wu He called the DA’s bare-bones indictment a “systematically crafted” document that confounds Trump’s lawyers as they try to poke holes in the case.

“The short-term style of changing charges will deprive Trump’s legal team of specific information to attack from the correct and legal angles,” Wu praised as a possible strategy.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *